Coronavirus origins: genome analysis suggests two viruses may have combined

Lifesavers Post in Health News,Health Tips
  • Scientists have been trying to understand the origin of COVID-19 and the virus that causes it: SARS-CoV-2.
  • Originally, scientists believed the virus may have developed in bats, and later pangolins.
  • However, genomic comparisons suggest that the SARS-Cov-2 virus is the result of a recombination between two different viruses, meaning the exact origin of the virus is still unclear.

In the space of a few weeks, we have all learned a lot about COVID-19 and the virus that causes it: SARS-CoV-2. But there have also been a lot of rumors. And while the number of scientific articles on this virus is increasing, there are still many grey areas as to its origins.

In which animal species did it occur? A bat, a pangolin or another wild species? Where does it come from? From a cave or a forest in the Chinese province of Hubei, or elsewhere?

In December 2019, 27 of the first 41 people hospitalized (66%) passed through a market located in the heart of Wuhan city in Hubei province. But, according to a study conducted at Wuhan Hospital, the very first human case identified did not frequent this market. Instead, a molecular dating estimate based on the SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences indicates an origin in November. This raises questions about the link between this COVID-19 epidemic and wildlife.

Genomic data

The SARS-CoV-2 genome was rapidly sequenced by Chinese researchers. It is an RNA molecule of about 30,000 bases containing 15 genes, including the S gene which codes for a protein located on the surface of the viral envelope (for comparison, our genome is in the form of a double helix of DNA about 3 billion bases in size and contains about 30,000 genes).

Comparative genomic analyses have shown that SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the group of Betacoronaviruses and that it is very close to SARS-CoV, responsible for an epidemic of acute pneumonia which appeared in November 2002 in the Chinese province of Guangdong and then spread to 29 countries in 2003. A total of 8,098 cases were recorded, including 774 deaths. It is known that bats of the genus Rhinolophus (potentially several cave species) were the reservoir of this virus and that a small carnivore, the palm civet (Paguma larvata), may have served as an intermediate host between bats and the first human cases.

Since then, many Betacoronaviruses have been discovered, mainly in bats, but also in humans. For example, RaTG13, isolated from a bat of the species Rhinolophus affinis collected in China’s Yunan Province, has recently been described as very similar to SARS-CoV-2, with genome sequences identical to 96%. These results indicate that bats, and in particular species of the genus Rhinolophus, constitute the reservoir of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

But how do you define a reservoir? A reservoir is one or several animal species that are not or not very sensitive to the virus, which will naturally host one or several viruses. The absence of symptoms of the disease is explained by the effectiveness of their immune system, which allows them to fight against too much viral proliferation.

Recombination mechanism

On February 7, 2020, we learned that a virus even closer to SARS-CoV-2 had been discovered in pangolin. With 99% of genomic concordance reported, this suggested a more likely reservoir than bats. However, a recent study under review shows that the genome of the coronavirus isolated from the Malaysian pangolin (Manis javanica) is less similar to SARS-Cov-2, with only 90% of genomic concordance. This would indicate that the virus isolated in the pangolin is not responsible for the COVID-19 epidemic currently raging.

However, the coronavirus isolated from pangolin is similar at 99% in a specific region of the S protein, which corresponds to the 74 amino acids involved in the ACE (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2) receptor binding domain, the one that allows the virus to enter human cells to infect them. By contrast, the virus RaTG13 isolated from bat R. affinis is highly divergent in this specific region (only 77 % of similarity). This means that the coronavirus isolated from pangolin is capable of entering human cells whereas the one isolated from bat R. affinis is not.

In addition, these genomic comparisons suggest that the SARS-Cov-2 virus is the result of a recombination between two different viruses, one close to RaTG13 and the other closer to the pangolin virus. In other words, it is a chimera between two pre-existing viruses.

This recombination mechanism had already been described in coronaviruses, in particular, to explain the origin of SARS-CoV. It is important to know that recombination results in a new virus potentially capable of infecting a new host species. For recombination to occur, the two divergent viruses must have infected the same organism simultaneously.

Two questions remain unanswered: in which organism did this recombination occur? (a bat, a pangolin or another species?) And above all, under what conditions did this recombination take place?

facebook Share on Facebook
Twitter Tweet
Follow Follow us

151 thoughts on “Coronavirus origins: genome analysis suggests two viruses may have combined”

  1. 802255 325459Echt tolle Seite. Rubbish bin eigentlich nur per Zufall hier gelandet, aber ich bin jetzt schon complete von der tremendous Seite beeindruckt. Gratuliere dazu!! Viel Erfolg noch durch der sehr guten Home-page mein Freund. 220193

    Reply

  3. 464968 227614Excellent artical, I unfortunately had some troubles printing this artcle out, The print formating looks slightly screwed more than, something you might want to appear into. 749583

    Reply

  4. 401578 984843Aw, this was a truly nice post. In thought I would like to put in writing like this in addition – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article but what can I say I procrastinate alot and by no indicates appear to get something done. 38153

    Reply

  10. 900211 698881Hi there, just became aware of your weblog via Google, and located that it is actually informative. Im gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate in the event you continue this in future. Lots of individuals will be benefited from your writing. Cheers! 84494

    Reply

  17. 941525 88560Aw, this was a genuinely good post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and actual effort to make an excellent post?nonetheless what can I say?I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done. 159478

    Reply

  18. 149930 717795Hi there! Do you use Twitter? Id like to follow you if that would be ok. Im undoubtedly enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts. 883948

    Reply

  21. 809787 562935Cheapest player speeches and toasts, or possibly toasts. continue to be brought about real estate . during evening reception tend to be likely to just be comic, witty and therefore instructive as properly. finest man speeches no cost 68205

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *